"Saya Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan dengan nama Allah saya bersumpah saya telah diliwat oleh Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim pada 26 Jun 2008 dan pada hari tersebut Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim telah memasukkan zakarnya ke dalam dubur saya.
"Jika saya berdusta dengan perkara ini, saya berdusta dengan Allah SWT dan akan dilaknat oleh Allah SWT sehingga hari kiamat."
He swore on Quran.
I don't see any value in doing this. Swearing is definitely not a way to resolve legal matters, it is childish! Surprise to see that former PM agree in doing this. If it really works, all the criminals should convert to muslim and swear on Quran to free themselves.
Another thing,
Is it possible that a 61 years old elderly man manage to pull down the pants of a 23 years old tall and strong young man, aim his 'zakar' and penetrate into that tiny anus by force?
Logically, It is IMPOSSIBLE, unless the young man is willing to commit himself: tilt his buttock, stay still, and get ready to be inserted. So, since 'suka sama suka', why is he accusing that elderly man now?
He is not solving the legal matters. He is still bound to what the court has to say in few months time.
ReplyDeleteIt is not as simple as "all the criminals should convert to muslim and swear on Quran to free themselves"
It is a matter of proving that what he reported was "true". not just to him but to all muslims who believe in what the Quran says.
He did not ask u to agree with him and he never ask the non-muslims to agree with him. It is just a religious thing. Leave the comments by nik aziz and all the so-called muslim extremists; they are just trying to prove that they are better muslims and the rest are not "real" muslims. very saddening.
btw, "nice" blog.
- ur malay friend.
wow, din expect to get such a comment. do u own a blog? would like to have a look.
ReplyDeleteas u said, im a non-muslim,i don't know much about Quran, but i certainly know what i see as a non-muslim, as a malaysian.
since u said that he is still bound to the court, then what is he actually trying to prove? there is no point in doing this, as swearing carries no value in court. It is merely a show, a great show to impress the muslims.
You do have islamic law, don't you? in civil court, swearing has no value. so, does it carries value in islamic law? if not, then, what is the point of swearing?
I dont know about nik aziz, im not interested in knowing him.
I truly believe that islam is a holy religion,
but what i see,as a non-muslim and as a malaysian, is that the corruption is rampant in here, the politicians have double-standard and constantly make stupid statements, and most of them, if not all, are muslims.
That is what i see.
i agree with voyageur. there s no point in doing tat. yes, they didnt ask ppl to agree with that. but psychologically they are still using it as a tool to brain-wash the public, esp muslims, that he is brave enough to swear on Quran.
ReplyDeletethe other point that voyageur had pointed out is that how could a 61 yo man forced a 23 yo young man, esp it s a not very healthy man( we know that Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim had been hospitalised for few times when he was in the jail). from this matter, I do think that we should not discuss this matter from religious point of view but to look at it using logical thinking.
from what mohd saiful swore, he didnt mention he was forced. means if by chance, they had this unusual relationship, then he shouldn't sue him. otherwise, both of them have to be sued.
in conclusion, i hope the politician should always responsible for their words and action as well as ourselves. if u dare to leave comment, then leave ur name also.
yeah. i think there is no expectation from that young man of getting free from the court, but it's more to convincing people, especialy the muslims, that he is 'innocent'.
ReplyDeleteagree with bernard, there's something related to psychology in this whole swearing thing.
but there's a lot of questionable questions in this case. one of them is what voyageur has pointed out in the post. there's no possible chance that he could be sodomized by force. just look at him! young and strong man he is.
i'm just dissapointed to see that he swore by the name of God and the Holy Quran.
today on the front page of a local newspaper. 'someone' swears by the name of God to prove that he has nothing to do with the case of Altantuya.
what's going on with this world... why don't they just let all those prisoners in the prisons to swear to prove that they are not guilty. easy that way, eh? *sigh*